Agent Identity Protocol (AIP)
The Zero-Trust Identity Layer for MCP & Autonomous Agents
The God Mode Problem
Today's AI agents operate with unrestricted access to your infrastructure. When you connect Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible agent to your systems, it receives god mode—full access to every tool the server exposes.
Model safety isn't enough. Attacks like Indirect Prompt Injection—demonstrated by the GeminiJack vulnerability—have proven that adversarial instructions embedded in documents, emails, or data can hijack agent behavior. The model believes it's following your intent while executing the attacker's commands.
Your agent is one poisoned PDF away from rm -rf /.
"Authentication is for Users. AIP is for Agents."
AIP introduces policy-based authorization at the tool-call layer—the missing security primitive between your agents and your infrastructure.
Architecture
High-Level Flow
AIP operates as a transparent proxy between the AI client (Cursor, Claude, VS Code) and the MCP tool server. Every tool call passes through the policy engine before reaching the real tool.
graph LR
subgraph Client["🤖 AI Client"]
A[Cursor / Claude Desktop]
end
subgraph AIP["🛡️ AIP Proxy (Sidecar)"]
B[Policy Engine]
C[DLP Scanner]
D[Audit Log]
end
subgraph Server["🔧 Real Tool"]
E[Docker / Postgres / GitHub]
end
A -->|"tools/call"| B
B -->|"✅ ALLOW"| E
B -->|"🔴 DENY"| A
B --> C
C --> D
E -->|"response"| C
C -->|"filtered"| A
style B fill:#22c55e,stroke:#16a34a,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
style AIP fill:#f0fdf4,stroke:#16a34a,stroke-width:3px
Defense-in-Depth: Attack Blocked
When an injected prompt attempts to execute a dangerous operation, AIP intercepts and blocks it before the tool ever receives the request.
sequenceDiagram
participant Agent as 🤖 Agent (Hijacked)
participant AIP as 🛡️ AIP Proxy
participant Policy as 📋 agent.yaml
participant Tool as 🔧 Real Tool
Agent->>AIP: tools/call "delete_database"
AIP->>Policy: Check allowed_tools
Policy-->>AIP: ❌ Not in allowlist
AIP->>AIP: 🔴 Decision: DENY
AIP-->>Agent: Error: -32001 Permission Denied
Note over Tool: ⚠️ Never receives request
Note over AIP: 📝 Logged to audit trail
Why AIP?
| Feature | Standard MCP | AIP-Enabled MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Injection | ⚠️ Vulnerable — Executes any command | ✅ Protected — Blocks unauthorized intent |
| Data Exfiltration | ⚠️ Unrestricted internet access | ✅ Egress filtering + DLP redaction |
| Consent Fatigue | ⚠️ Click "Allow" 50 times per session | ✅ Policy-based autonomy |
| Audit Trail | ⚠️ None / stdio logs | ✅ Immutable JSONL structured logs |
| Privilege Model | ⚠️ All-or-nothing API keys | ✅ Per-tool, per-argument validation |
| Human-in-the-Loop | ⚠️ Not supported | ✅ Native OS approval dialogs |
How is AIP Different?
vs. Workforce AI Governance (e.g., SurePath.ai)
AIP and workforce AI governance tools solve different problems at different layers:
| Aspect | Workforce AI Governance | AIP |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Employee AI usage monitoring | Agent action authorization |
| Layer | Network/application level | Tool-call level |
| Question | "Who in my org is using AI?" | "What can my AI agents do?" |
| Deployment | Typically SaaS | Open protocol, self-hosted |
| Use Case | Audit employee ChatGPT usage | Block agent from deleting databases |
These are complementary: Use workforce governance to monitor employee AI usage. Use AIP to secure the agents those employees build.
vs. OAuth / API Keys
| Aspect | OAuth | AIP |
|---|---|---|
| Granularity | Scope-level ("repo access") | Action-level ("repos.get with org:X") |
| Timing | Grant-time | Runtime (every call) |
| Audience | End users | Developers/Security teams |
| Format | Token claims | YAML policy files |
OAuth answers "who is this?" — AIP answers "should this specific action be allowed?"
See It In Action
When an agent attempts a dangerous operation, AIP blocks it immediately:
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 1,
"error": {
"code": -32001,
"message": "Permission Denied: Tool 'delete_database' is not allowed by policy"
}
}
What just happened?
- Agent (possibly hijacked by prompt injection) tries to call
delete_database - AIP policy engine checks
allowed_toolslist - Tool not found → Request blocked before reaching your infrastructure
- Attempt logged to audit trail for forensic analysis
Your database never received the request. This is zero-trust authorization in action.
Quick Start
Secure any MCP tool server in one command:
# Secure your local Docker MCP
aip wrap docker --policy ./policies/read-only.yaml
Or protect your existing configuration:
# Start the AIP proxy with your policy
aip --target "python mcp_server.py" --policy ./agent.yaml
# Generate Cursor IDE configuration
aip --generate-cursor-config --policy ./agent.yaml --target "npx @mcp/server"
Example Policy
apiVersion: aip.io/v1alpha1
kind: AgentPolicy
metadata:
name: secure-agent
spec:
mode: enforce
allowed_tools:
- read_file
- list_directory
- git_status
tool_rules:
- tool: write_file
action: ask # Human approval required
- tool: exec_command
action: block # Never allowed
dlp:
patterns:
- name: "AWS Key"
regex: "AKIA[A-Z0-9]{16}"
Roadmap
We're building a standard, not just a tool.
-
v0.1: Localhost Proxy — The "Little Snitch" for AI Agents
- Tool allowlist enforcement
- Argument validation with regex
- Human-in-the-Loop (macOS, Linux)
- DLP output scanning
- JSONL audit logging
- Monitor mode
-
v0.2: Kubernetes Sidecar — The "Istio" for AI Agents
- Helm chart
- NetworkPolicy integration
- Prometheus metrics
-
v1.0: OIDC / SPIFFE Federation — Enterprise Identity
- Workload identity federation
- Centralized policy management
- Multi-tenant audit aggregation
Documentation
| Resource | Description |
|---|---|
| AIP Specification | Formal protocol definition (v1alpha1) |
| Policy Reference | Complete YAML schema |
| Go Proxy README | Reference implementation |
| Quickstart Guide | 5-minute tutorial |
| Why AIP? | Threat model and design rationale |
| FAQ | Common questions |
Contributing
AIP is an open specification. We welcome:
- Protocol feedback — Issues and PRs to the spec
- New implementations — Build AIP in Rust, TypeScript, Python
- Security research — Threat modeling, attack surface analysis
- Documentation — Tutorials, examples, integrations
See CONTRIBUTING.md for guidelines.
License
Apache 2.0 — See LICENSE
Enterprise-friendly. Use it, fork it, build on it.
Security
For vulnerability reports, see SECURITY.md.
Stop trusting your agents. Start verifying them.